Agenda Item

6.5 21-1246 10:00 A.M. - Discussion and Consideration of Board Action in Response to a Gate on a Public Roadway - 6 Month Review

   Oppose     Neutral     Support    
2500 of 2500 characters remaining
  • 10225287355428791
    Eibhlin Cristiona almost 3 years ago

    I would like to know why Supervisor Crandell recused himself from this matter? What is the conflict of interest? Furthermore, what is the point in having First Nations represented on the Lake County Board of Supervisors if they cannot serve or defend the interests of tribal members within our County's Electorate? If this is your logic, then the non-native board members ought to recuse themselves from deliberating non-native matters! The county should pay for whatever needs to be done to protect the land behind the gate in question from pillaging, dumping and potential arsonists. The county ought to pay for any special costs because it guards a county road/egress.