6.4 21-632 10:00 A.M. - PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration of Rezone for Brand Family Parcel Map Project; General Plan Amendment (GPAP 17-01); Rezone (RZ 17-01); Parcel Map (PM 17-01); and Initial Study (IS 17-31)
In the minutes of the 12/10/20 Planning Commission meeting it states the following regarding Parcel 4. On page 7 “Proposed Parcel 4 (5.93 acres) has a cross slope of 29% and would remain undeveloped.” And on Page 8 it states “According to the Tentative Parcel Map, the proposed parcels contain cross slopes of 15% to 29% and the steepest portion of the site (proposed parcel 4) is to remain undeveloped.
In the Conditions of Approval 7/20/21 these statements are deleted without explanation and instead the following appears under B. Parcel Map Conditions #22 A site evaluation shall be completed in the area of parcels 3 and 4 to determine if the soil is suitable for an on-site wastewater treatment system (OWTS). The applicant must apply for an OWTS permit prior to approval of building permits. This is contrary to the staff report to the Planning Commission. Therefore did not receive Planning Commission approval. This must be returned to the Planning Commission for review.
4 Conditions of Approval we oppose
1.There is no mention to widen the encroachment to 20 feet from Roberts Road to Hwy 29 as recommended in Mike Wink’s email to Ham 7/28/2020 & from DOT memo of 8/2020. This recommendation must be a condition of approval of project. Note that these documents are not present in the submission to the Board as agency comments.
2.#12 references Brand Lane intersecting with Hwy 29 is an error. The correct name of the road leading from the south & curving east to intersect Highway 29 is Roberts Road. 5/18/93 The BOS named this road Roberts Road.
3.#13 The name Brand Lane be changed to Roberts Road for the section of the eastward road from the Brand property gate to Hwy 29.
4.The DOT letter 8/20/20 states “we note that the state standards allow the lots to potentially be developed in the future with up to 8 residences.” We oppose this possibility & ask as a condition of approval adding additional residences to these 4 lots be prohibited.
Hall & Dunbar
In the minutes of the 12/10/20 Planning Commission meeting it states the following regarding Parcel 4. On page 7 “Proposed Parcel 4 (5.93 acres) has a cross slope of 29% and would remain undeveloped.” And on Page 8 it states “According to the Tentative Parcel Map, the proposed parcels contain cross slopes of 15% to 29% and the steepest portion of the site (proposed parcel 4) is to remain undeveloped.
In the Conditions of Approval 7/20/21 these statements are deleted without explanation and instead the following appears under B. Parcel Map Conditions #22 A site evaluation shall be completed in the area of parcels 3 and 4 to determine if the soil is suitable for an on-site wastewater treatment system (OWTS). The applicant must apply for an OWTS permit prior to approval of building permits. This is contrary to the staff report to the Planning Commission. Therefore did not receive Planning Commission approval. This must be returned to the Planning Commission for review.
4 Conditions of Approval we oppose
1.There is no mention to widen the encroachment to 20 feet from Roberts Road to Hwy 29 as recommended in Mike Wink’s email to Ham 7/28/2020 & from DOT memo of 8/2020. This recommendation must be a condition of approval of project. Note that these documents are not present in the submission to the Board as agency comments.
2.#12 references Brand Lane intersecting with Hwy 29 is an error. The correct name of the road leading from the south & curving east to intersect Highway 29 is Roberts Road. 5/18/93 The BOS named this road Roberts Road.
3.#13 The name Brand Lane be changed to Roberts Road for the section of the eastward road from the Brand property gate to Hwy 29.
4.The DOT letter 8/20/20 states “we note that the state standards allow the lots to potentially be developed in the future with up to 8 residences.” We oppose this possibility & ask as a condition of approval adding additional residences to these 4 lots be prohibited.
Hall & Dunbar